| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The org.keycloak.services.resources.SocialResource.callback method in JBoss KeyCloak before 1.0.3.Final allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks by leveraging lack of CSRF protection. |
| Huawei Tecal RH1288 V2 V100R002C00SPC107 and earlier versions, Tecal RH2265 V2 V100R002C00, Tecal RH2285 V2 V100R002C00SPC115 and earlier versions, Tecal RH2265 V2 V100R002C00, Tecal RH2285H V2 V100R002C00SPC111 and earlier versions, Tecal RH2268 V2 V100R002C00, Tecal RH2288 V2 V100R002C00SPC117 and earlier versions, Tecal RH2288H V2 V100R002C00SPC115 and earlier versions, Tecal RH2485 V2 V100R002C00SPC502 and earlier versions, Tecal RH5885 V2 V100R001C02SPC109 and earlier versions, Tecal RH5885 V3 V100R003C01SPC102 and earlier versions, Tecal RH5885H V3 V100R003C00SPC102 and earlier versions, Tecal XH310 V2 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal XH311 V2 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal XH320 V2 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal XH621 V2 V100R001C00SPC106 and earlier versions, Tecal DH310 V2 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal DH320 V2 V100R001C00SPC106 and earlier versions, Tecal DH620 V2 V100R001C00SPC106 and earlier versions, Tecal DH621 V2 V100R001C00SPC107 and earlier versions, Tecal DH628 V2 V100R001C00SPC107 and earlier versions, Tecal BH620 V2 V100R002C00SPC107 and earlier versions, Tecal BH621 V2 V100R002C00SPC106 and earlier versions, Tecal BH622 V2 V100R002C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal BH640 V2 V100R002C00SPC108 and earlier versions, Tecal CH121 V100R001C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH140 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal CH220 V100R001C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH221 V100R001C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH222 V100R002C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH240 V100R001C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH242 V100R001C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH242 V3 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions have a CSRF vulnerability. The products do not use the Token mechanism for web access control. When users log in to the Huawei servers and access websites containing the malicious CSRF script, the CSRF script is executed, which may cause configuration tampering and system restart. |
| HedEx Earlier than V200R006C00 versions has a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. An attacker could trick a user into accessing a website containing malicious scripts which may tamper with configurations and interrupt normal services. |
| Umbraco before 7.4.0 allows remote attackers to bypass anti-forgery security measures and conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks as demonstrated by editing user account information in the templates.asmx.cs file. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Hexis HawkEye G 3.0.1.4912 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add arbitrary accounts via the name parameter to interface/rest/accounts/json; turn off the (2) Url matching, (3) DNS Inject, or (4) IP Redirect Sensor in a request to interface/rest/dpi/setEnabled/1; or (5) perform whitelisting of malware MD5 hash IDs via the id parameter to interface/rest/md5-threats/whitelist. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ManageEngine Password Manager Pro before 8.5 (Build 8500). |
| services/system_io/actionprocessor/System.rails in ConnectWise Manage 2017.5 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), as demonstrated by changing an e-mail address setting. |
| A remote unauthenticated network based attacker with access to Junos Space may execute arbitrary code on Junos Space or gain access to devices managed by Junos Space using cross site request forgery (CSRF), default authentication credentials, information leak and command injection attack vectors. All versions of Juniper Networks Junos Space prior to 15.1R3 are affected. |
| J-Web does not validate certain input that may lead to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) issues or cause a denial of J-Web service (DoS). |
| Techroutes TR 1803-3G Wireless Cellular Router/Modem 2.4.25 devices do not possess any protection against a CSRF vulnerability, as demonstrated by a goform/BasicSettings request to disable port filtering. |
| IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 123858. |
| In Hitachi Vantara Pentaho BA Platform through 8.0, a CSRF issue exists in the Business Analytics application. |
| A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Lenovo Service Bridge before version 4 could be exploited by an attacker with access to the DHCP server used by the system where LSB is installed. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via IMG element in Tiki before 16.3, 17.x before 17.1, 12 LTS before 12.12 LTS, and 15 LTS before 15.5 LTS allows an authenticated user to edit global permissions if an administrator opens a wiki page with an IMG element, related to tiki-objectpermissions.php. For example, an attacker could assign administrator privileges to every unauthenticated user of the site. |
| Kibana Reporting plugin version 2.4.0 is vulnerable to a CSRF vulnerability that could allow an attacker to generate superfluous reports whenever an authenticated Kibana user navigates to a specially-crafted page. |
| Allen Disk 1.6 has CSRF in setpass.php with an impact of changing a password. |
| The cp-contact-form-with-paypal (aka CP Contact Form with PayPal) plugin before 1.1.6 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS, related to cp_contactformpp.php and cp_contactformpp_admin_int_list.inc.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Realtyna RPL (com_rpl) component before 8.9.5 for Joomla! allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add a user via an add_user action to administrator/index.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SOGo before 3.1.0. |
| Role-based Authorization Strategy Plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. This allowed attackers to add administrator role to any user, or to remove the authorization configuration, preventing legitimate access to Jenkins. |
