| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) before 3.19, as used in Mozilla Firefox before 39.0, Firefox ESR 31.x before 31.8 and 38.x before 38.1, Thunderbird before 38.1, and other products, does not properly determine state transitions for the TLS state machine, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by blocking messages, as demonstrated by removing a forward-secrecy property by blocking a ServerKeyExchange message, aka a "SMACK SKIP-TLS" issue. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CS-Cart 4.2.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that change a user password via a request to profiles-update/. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the admin panel in osCMax before 2.5.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct SQL injection attacks via the (1) status parameter to admin/stats_monthly_sales.php or (2) country parameter in a process action to admin/create_account_process.php. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Template CMS 2.1.1 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create an administrator user via an add action to admin/index.php or (2) conduct static PHP code injection attacks via the themes_editor parameter in an edit_template action to admin/index.php. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Horde before 5.2.8, Horde Groupware before 5.2.11, and Horde Groupware Webmail Edition before 5.2.11 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary (1) commands via the cmd parameter to admin/cmdshell.php, (2) SQL queries via the sql parameter to admin/sqlshell.php, or (3) PHP code via the php parameter to admin/phpshell.php. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in admin/class-bulk-editor-list-table.php in the WordPress SEO by Yoast plugin before 1.5.7, 1.6.x before 1.6.4, and 1.7.x before 1.7.4 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of certain users for requests that conduct SQL injection attacks via the (1) order_by or (2) order parameter in the wpseo_bulk-editor page. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Custom Sitemap module for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete sitemaps via unspecified vectors. |
| CakePHP 2.x and 3.x before 3.1.5 might allow remote attackers to bypass the CSRF protection mechanism via the _method parameter. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Roundcube Webmail before 1.0.4 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors, related to (1) address book operations or the (2) ACL or (3) Managesieve plugins. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the user portal in Dell SonicWALL Secure Remote Access (SRA) products with firmware before 7.5.1.0-38sv and 8.x before 8.0.0.1-16sv allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that create bookmarks via a crafted request to cgi-bin/editBookmark. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP System Management Homepage (SMH) before 7.5.0 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the com_templates component in Joomla! 3.2.0 through 3.3.x and 3.4.x before 3.4.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the CrossSlide jQuery (crossslide-jquery-plugin-for-wordpress) plugin 2.0.5 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change plugin settings or conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the (2) csj_width, (3) csj_height, (4) csj_sleep, (5) csj_fade, or (6) upload_image parameter in the thisismyurl_csj.php page to wp-admin/options-general.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Spider Video Player module for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete videos via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Spider Catalog module for Drupal allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete (1) products, (2) ratings, or (3) categories via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Easy Social Icons plugin before 1.2.3 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the image_file parameter in an edit action in the cnss_social_icon_add page to wp-admin/admin.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Spider Contacts module for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete contact categories via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Revive Adserver before 3.2.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) perform certain plugin actions and possibly cause a denial of service (disabled core plugins) via unknown vectors or (2) change the contact name and language or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted POST request to an account-user-*.php script. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Watchdog Aggregator module for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that enable or disable monitoring sites via unspecified vectors. |
| wolfSSL (formerly CyaSSL) before 3.6.8 does not properly handle faults associated with the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) process when allowing ephemeral key exchange without low memory optimizations on a server, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private RSA keys by capturing TLS handshakes, aka a Lenstra attack. |
