Search Results (1217 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-94543 1 Vercel 1 Next.js 2026-10-06 5.3 Medium
Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 15.0.0 until 15.5.27 and 16.3.8, self-hosted applications using the Pages Router with statically generated or Incremental Static Regeneration pages can key a response cache entry without sufficiently binding it to the source route. A request can replace one page's cache entry with content from a different route, causing the affected page to serve incorrect content to every visitor until revalidation. Applications deployed on Vercel are not affected. This issue is fixed in versions 15.5.27 and 16.3.8.
CVE-2026-92030 1 Mozilla 2 Firefox, Thunderbird 2026-10-06 5.4 Medium
Mitigation bypass in the DOM: Copy & Paste and Drag & Drop component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 140.16, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, Thunderbird 140.16, and Thunderbird 153.3.
CVE-2026-92018 1 Mozilla 2 Firefox, Thunderbird 2026-10-06 9.6 Critical
Sandbox escape in the DOM: Core & HTML component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 115.41, Firefox ESR 140.16, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, Thunderbird 140.16, and Thunderbird 153.3.
CVE-2026-92019 1 Mozilla 2 Firefox, Thunderbird 2026-10-06 8.1 High
Mitigation bypass in the Remote Settings Client component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 115.41, Firefox ESR 140.16, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, Thunderbird 140.16, and Thunderbird 153.3.
CVE-2026-100775 1 Mozilla 2 Firefox, Thunderbird 2026-10-06 9.6 Critical
Sandbox escape in the Graphics component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox ESR 153.4, Thunderbird 157, Thunderbird 140.17, Thunderbird 153.4, Firefox 157, Firefox ESR 115.42, and Firefox ESR 140.17.
CVE-2026-94251 1 Apache 2 Sling Security, Sling Security Bundle 2026-10-06 6.5 Medium
A vulnerability in Apache Sling Security Bundle: ContentDispositionFilter mediates only one address/API shape of a resource This issue affects Apache Sling Security Bundle: before 1.3.12. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.3.12, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-105083 1 Imagemagick 1 Imagemagick 2026-10-05 3.9 Low
ImageMagick before 7.1.2-32 and 6.9.13-57 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in LoadPolicyCache that silently skips security policy rules when policy.xml uses an alternate DOCTYPE. A valid DOCTYPE not ending in ']>' makes the parser consume the rest of the file, so no policy rules are applied and restricted operations become allowed.
CVE-2026-94484 1 Vercel 1 Next.js 2026-10-05 4.8 Medium
Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 15.0.0 until 15.5.27 and 16.3.8, applications with a root-level catch-all page and statically generated or Incremental Static Regeneration routes can use a shared response cache key that is insufficiently scoped to the source route. A single unauthenticated crafted request can poison that cache, causing cross-user content substitution or persistent denial of service until the poisoned entry is revalidated or replaced. This issue is fixed in versions 15.5.27 and 16.3.8.
CVE-2026-92074 1 Mozilla 2 Firefox, Thunderbird 2026-10-05 8.8 High
Mitigation bypass in the Popup Blocker component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, and Thunderbird 153.3.
CVE-2026-92075 1 Mozilla 2 Firefox, Thunderbird 2026-10-05 9.1 Critical
Mitigation bypass in the Networking component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, and Thunderbird 153.3.
CVE-2026-92079 1 Mozilla 2 Firefox, Thunderbird 2026-10-05 9.1 Critical
Mitigation bypass in the Widget: Win32 component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, and Thunderbird 153.3.
CVE-2026-92057 1 Mozilla 2 Firefox, Thunderbird 2026-10-05 9.1 Critical
Mitigation bypass in the Enterprise Policies component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, and Thunderbird 153.3.
CVE-2026-92066 1 Mozilla 2 Firefox, Thunderbird 2026-10-05 9.8 Critical
Sandbox escape in the Profile Backup component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156 and Thunderbird 156.
CVE-2026-92038 1 Mozilla 2 Firefox, Thunderbird 2026-10-05 9.1 Critical
Mitigation bypass in the Remote Settings Client component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, and Thunderbird 153.3.
CVE-2026-92039 1 Mozilla 2 Firefox, Thunderbird 2026-10-05 6.3 Medium
Mitigation bypass in the DOM: Notifications component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, and Thunderbird 153.3.
CVE-2026-92041 1 Mozilla 2 Firefox, Thunderbird 2026-10-05 9.1 Critical
Mitigation bypass in the DOM: Networking component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, and Thunderbird 153.3.
CVE-2026-71892 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. 2 Bc-fja, Bc-java 2026-10-05 N/A
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the opt-in key-size validation on CMS key-transport recipients, org.bouncycastle.cms.jcajce.JceKeyTransRecipient.setKeySizeValidation(true), never ran for a message using RFC 9709 content-encryption key derivation (id-alg-cek-hkdf-sha256). The branch that should have selected the actual content-encryption algorithm carried in the key derivation AlgorithmIdentifier's parameters compared the encrypted-key byte array against the id-alg-cek-hkdf-sha256 object identifier, a comparison between a byte array and an ASN1ObjectIdentifier that is false for every possible input, so the check fell through to a key-size lookup on the outer wrapper OID. That OID identifies a key-derivation construction rather than a cipher and has no registered key size, so the size comparison was skipped entirely. A key-transport EnvelopedData or AuthEnvelopedData whose transported, HKDF-derived content-encryption key did not match the key size of the advertised content-encryption algorithm was therefore accepted even with validation explicitly enabled, silently defeating the only mechanism the API offers for enforcing recovered key size. The recipient now dispatches on the content-encryption AlgorithmIdentifier's algorithm OID, so validation checks the recovered key against the inner content-encryption algorithm. Messages with a matching key size, non-HKDF messages, and recipients that do not enable validation are unaffected. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpkix-fips 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series).
CVE-2026-100808 1 Mozilla 2 Firefox, Thunderbird 2026-10-05 8.8 High
Mitigation bypass in the DOM: Service Workers component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox ESR 153.4, Thunderbird 157, Thunderbird 153.4, and Firefox 157.
CVE-2026-72131 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-10-03 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme-apple: Prevent shared tags across queues on Apple A11 On Apple A11, tags of pending commands must be unique across the admin and IO queues, else the firmware crashes with "duplicate tag error for tag N", with N being the tag. Apply the existing workaround for M1 of reserving two tags for the admin queue to A11.
CVE-2026-93304 1 Wolfssl 1 Wolfssl 2026-10-02 3.7 Low
A (D)TLS 1.2 client can accept a ChangeCipherSpec message before it has sent its ClientKeyExchange. No master secret has been derived at that point, so the client installs read keys derived from a known (deterministic) key and checks the server's Finished against that same key. An out-of-order ChangeCipherSpec can therefore be used by an attacker to complete the handshake in place of the server and send data the client accepts as authentic. The client's own traffic still uses correctly derived keys, so the attacker cannot read it, and the genuine server never completes the handshake. DTLS 1.2 clients are exposed because a datagram read can deliver the out-of-order records on its own. TLS 1.2 clients are exposed when the application supplies received bytes with wolfSSL_inject() or enables read ahead. For certificate suites, the attacker must be in a man-in-the-middle position. For PSK (Pre Shared Key) connections, any fake server can succeed without knowing the PSK.