Search
Search Results (22555 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-37331 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Sql Server, Sql Server 2016, Sql Server 2017 and 2 more | 2025-12-09 | 8.8 High |
| SQL Server Native Client OLE DB Provider Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-37332 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Sql Server, Sql Server 2016, Sql Server 2017 and 2 more | 2025-12-09 | 8.8 High |
| SQL Server Native Client OLE DB Provider Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-37318 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Sql Server, Sql Server 2016, Sql Server 2017 and 2 more | 2025-12-09 | 8.8 High |
| SQL Server Native Client OLE DB Provider Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21415 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Sql Server, Sql Server 2016, Sql Server 2017 and 2 more | 2025-12-09 | 8.8 High |
| SQL Server Native Client OLE DB Provider Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21414 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Sql Server, Sql Server 2016, Sql Server 2017 and 2 more | 2025-12-09 | 8.8 High |
| SQL Server Native Client OLE DB Provider Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21398 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Sql Server, Sql Server 2016, Sql Server 2017 and 2 more | 2025-12-09 | 8.8 High |
| SQL Server Native Client OLE DB Provider Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21373 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Sql Server, Sql Server 2016, Sql Server 2017 and 2 more | 2025-12-09 | 8.8 High |
| SQL Server Native Client OLE DB Provider Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21335 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Sql Server, Sql Server 2016, Sql Server 2017 and 2 more | 2025-12-09 | 8.8 High |
| SQL Server Native Client OLE DB Provider Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21333 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Sql Server, Sql Server 2016, Sql Server 2017 and 2 more | 2025-12-09 | 8.8 High |
| SQL Server Native Client OLE DB Provider Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-38088 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Sql Server, Sql Server 2016, Sql Server 2017 and 2 more | 2025-12-09 | 8.8 High |
| SQL Server Native Client OLE DB Provider Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-37055 | 1 Dlink | 2 Go-rt-ac750, Go-rt-ac750 Firmware | 2025-12-09 | 9.8 Critical |
| D-Link Go-RT-AC750 GORTAC750_revA_v101b03 and GO-RT-AC750_revB_FWv200b02 are vulnerable to Buffer Overflow via cgibin, hnap_main, | ||||
| CVE-2025-42878 | 1 Sap | 1 Web Dispatcher And Internet Communication Manager | 2025-12-09 | 8.2 High |
| SAP Web Dispatcher and ICM may expose internal testing interfaces that are not intended for production. If enabled, unauthenticated attackers could exploit them to access diagnostics, send crafted requests, or disrupt services. This vulnerability has a high impact on confidentiality, availability and low impact on integrity and of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64331 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2025-12-08 | 7.5 High |
| Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, a stack overflow can occur on large HTTP file transfers if the user has increased the HTTP response body limit and enabled the logging of printable http bodies. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves using default HTTP response body limits and/or disabling http-body-printable logging; body logging is disabled by default. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8854 | 2 Bullet3 Project, Bulletphysics | 2 Bullet3, Pybullet | 2025-12-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in LoadOFF in bulletphysics bullet3 before 3.26 on all platforms allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted OFF file with an overlong initial token processed by the VHACD test utility or invoked indirectly through PyBullet's vhacd function. | ||||
| CVE-2025-33202 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Nvidia | 4 Linux, Linux Kernel, Windows and 1 more | 2025-12-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| NVIDIA Triton Inference Server for Linux and Windows contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause a stack overflow by sending extra-large payloads. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62507 | 1 Redis | 1 Redis | 2025-12-08 | 8.8 High |
| Redis is an open source, in-memory database that persists on disk. In versions 8.2.0 and above, a user can run the XACKDEL command with multiple ID's and trigger a stack buffer overflow, which may potentially lead to remote code execution. This issue is fixed in version 8.2.3. To workaround this issue without patching the redis-server executable is to prevent users from executing XACKDEL operation. This can be done using ACL to restrict XACKDEL command. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7011 | 2025-12-08 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Sharp NEC Projectors (NP-CB4500UL, NP-CB4500WL, NP-CB4700UL, NP-P525UL, NP-P525UL+, NP-P525ULG, NP-P525ULJL, NP-P525WL, NP-P525WL+, NP-P525WLG, NP-P525WLJL, NP-CG6500UL, NP-CG6500WL, NP-CG6700UL, NP-P605UL, NP-P605UL+, NP-P605ULG, NP-P605ULJL, NP-CA4120X, NP-CA4160W, NP-CA4160X, NP-CA4200U, NP-CA4200W, NP-CA4202W, NP-CA4260X, NP-CA4300X, NP-CA4355X, NP-CD2100U, NP-CD2120X, NP-CD2300X, NP-CR2100X, NP-CR2170W, NP-CR2170X, NP-CR2200U, NP-CR2200W, NP-CR2280X, NP-CR2310X, NP-CR2350X, NP-MC302XG, NP-MC332WG, NP-MC332WJL, NP-MC342XG, NP-MC372X, NP-MC372XG, NP-MC382W, NP-MC382WG, NP-MC422XG, NP-ME342UG, NP-ME372W, NP-ME372WG, NP-ME372WJL, NP-ME382U, NP-ME382UG, NP-ME382UJL, NP-ME402X, NP-ME402XG, NP-ME402XJL, NP-CB4500XL, NP-CG6400UL, NP-CG6400WL, NP-CG6500XL, NP-PE455UL, NP-PE455ULG, NP-PE455WL, NP-PE455WLG, NP-PE505XLG, NP-CB4600U, NP-CF6600U, NP-P474U, NP-P554U, NP-P554U+, NP-P554UG, NP-P554UJL, NP-CG6600UL, NP-P547UL, NP-P547ULG, NP-P547ULJL, NP-P607UL+, NP-P627UL, NP-P627UL+, NP-P627ULG, NP-P627ULJL, NP-PV710UL-B, NP-PV710UL-B1, NP-PV710UL-W, NP-PV710UL-W+, NP-PV710UL-W1, NP-PV730UL-BJL, NP-PV730UL-WJL, NP-PV800UL-B, NP-PV800UL-B+, NP-PV800UL-B1, NP-PV800UL-BJL, NP-PV800UL-W, NP-PV800UL-W+, NP-PV800UL-W1, NP-PV800UL-WJL, NP-CA4200X, NP-CA4265X, NP-CA4300U, NP-CA4300W, NP-CA4305X, NP-CA4400X, NP-CD2125X, NP-CD2200W, NP-CD2300U, NP-CD2310X, NP-CR2105X, NP-CR2200X, NP-CR2205W, NP-CR2300U, NP-CR2300W, NP-CR2315X, NP-CR2400X, NP-MC333XG, NP-MC363XG, NP-MC393WJL, NP-MC423W, NP-MC423WG, NP-MC453X, NP-MC453X, NP-MC453XG, NP-MC453XJL, NP-ME383WG, NP-ME403U, NP-ME403UG, NP-ME403UJL, NP-ME423W, NP-ME423WG, NP-ME423WJL, NP-ME453X, NP-ME453XG, NP-CB4400USL, NP-CB4400WSL, NP-CB4510UL, NP-CB4510WL, NP-CB4510XL, NP-CB4550USL, NP-CB6700UL, NP-CG6510UL, NP-PE456USL, NP-PE456USLG, NP-PE456USLJL, NP-PE456WSLG, NP-PE506UL, NP-PE506ULG, NP-PE506ULJL, NP-PE506WL, NP-PE506WLG, NP-PE506WLJL) allows an attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition via SNMP service. | ||||
| CVE-2021-20699 | 1 Sharp-nec-displays | 68 C431, C431 Firmware, C501 and 65 more | 2025-12-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| Sharp NEC Displays ((UN462A R1.300 and prior to it, UN462VA R1.300 and prior to it, UN492S R1.300 and prior to it, UN492VS R1.300 and prior to it, UN552A R1.300 and prior to it, UN552S R1.300 and prior to it, UN552VS R1.300 and prior to it, UN552 R1.300 and prior to it, UN552V R1.300 and prior to it, UX552S R1.300 and prior to it, UX552 R1.300 and prior to it, V864Q R2.000 and prior to it, C861Q R2.000 and prior to it, P754Q R2.000 and prior to it, V754Q R2.000 and prior to it, C751Q R2.000 and prior to it, V984Q R2.000 and prior to it, C981Q R2.000 and prior to it, P654Q R2.000 and prior to it, V654Q R2.000 and prior to it, C651Q R2.000 and prior to it, V554Q R2.000 and prior to it, P404 R3.200 and prior to it, P484 R3.200 and prior to it, P554 R3.200 and prior to it, V404 R3.200 and prior to it, V484 R3.200 and prior to it, V554 R3.200 and prior to it, V404-T R3.200 and prior to it, V484-T R3.200 and prior to it, V554-T R3.200 and prior to it, C501 R2.000 and prior to it, C551 R2.000 and prior to it, C431 R2.000 and prior to it) allows an attacker a buffer overflow and to execute remote code by sending long parameters that contains specific characters in http request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64182 | 1 Openexr | 1 Openexr | 2025-12-08 | 7.8 High |
| OpenEXR provides the specification and reference implementation of the EXR file format, an image storage format for the motion picture industry. In versions 3.2.0 through 3.2.4, 3.3.0 through 3.3.5, and 3.4.0 through 3.4.2, a memory safety bug in the legacy OpenEXR Python adapter (the deprecated OpenEXR.InputFile wrapper) allow crashes and likely code execution when opening attacker-controlled EXR files or when passing crafted Python objects. Integer overflow and unchecked allocation in InputFile.channel() and InputFile.channels() can lead to heap overflow (32 bit) or a NULL deref (64 bit). Versions 3.2.5, 3.3.6, and 3.4.3 contain a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60696 | 1 Linksys | 2 Re7000, Re7000 Firmware | 2025-12-08 | 8.4 High |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the makeRequest.cgi binary of Linksys RE7000 routers (Firmware FW_v2.0.15_211230_1012). The arplookup function parses lines from /proc/net/arp using sscanf("%16s ... %18s ..."), storing results into buffers v6 (12 bytes) and v7 (20 bytes). Since the format specifiers allow up to 16 and 18 bytes respectively, oversized input can overflow the buffers, resulting in stack corruption. Local attackers controlling /proc/net/arp contents can exploit this issue to cause denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code. | ||||