| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Inappropriate implementation in ScriptInjections in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| Inappropriate implementation in PerformanceAPIs in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in andreimarcu linux-server v.1.0 through v.2.3.8 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the uploadPutHandler function |
| webpack-dev-server versions 5.2.5 and earlier expose two internal developer endpoints, /webpack-dev-server/open-editor and /webpack-dev-server/invalidate, that perform state-changing actions on any GET request without verifying that the request originated from the dev server's own page. Any website a developer visits while the dev server is running can trigger these endpoints cross-origin with no interaction beyond the visit. An attacker can open an arbitrary existing local file in the developer's editor, including files outside the project root, and repeated requests can spawn editor processes and force recompilations that degrade the developer's machine. Patches: upgrade to webpack-dev-server 5.2.6. Workarounds: none. |
| Dancer2::Plugin::Auth::OAuth::Provider versions before 0.23 for Perl do not support the OAuth 2.0 state parameter.
The authentication_url method builds the provider authorization redirect without issuing a state value, and the callback method exchanges the callback code and registers the resulting token into the session without verifying that the callback corresponds to an authorization request this session initiated.
Any application that uses this plugin for OAuth 2.0 login is exposed to login cross-site request forgery: because the callback is not bound to the session that began the flow, an attacker who starts an authorization with their own provider account can deliver the resulting callback to a victim, causing the victim's session to complete the attacker's authorization and associating the attacker's provider identity and access token with that session. Where the application persists this as an account link, the attacker may retain access to the victim's account through their own provider credentials. |
| A CSRF vulnerability exists in the `zone-include.php` script in Revive Adserver 6.0.7. Linking and unlinking banners or campaigns to zones could be triggered via crafted GET or POST requests without any verification of the CSRF token, allowing an attacker to perform these actions on behalf of an authenticated administrator. |
| HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Missing SameSite Attribute vulnerability. The application fails to set the "SameSite" attribute on session cookies generated during authentication, which could allow a remote attacker to execute Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks if additional mitigations, such as Anti-CSRF tokens, are not implemented. |
| AVE DOMINAplus 1.10.x contains cross-site request forgery and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities that allow attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to exploit login.php parameters and execute arbitrary scripts in user browser sessions. |
| WordPress Lazy Content Slider Plugin 3.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions by crafting malicious HTML forms. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into submitting POST requests to the plugin settings page via lzcs_admin.php to modify plugin configuration parameters like lzcs_color and lzcs_count. |
| Rejetto HFS 3.0.0 through 3.2.0 accepts state-changing API requests via the GET method and exempts GET requests from its anti-CSRF header check. A remote attacker can perform administrative actions including account creation and configuration changes leading to code execution - by causing a logged-in administrator's browser to navigate to a crafted URL, or without any credentials against default installations when the attack originates from the server's own machine. |
| Sustainable Irrigation Platform (SIP) through version 5.2.16 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to perform state-changing administrative actions by luring a logged-in administrator into visiting a malicious page that issues HTTP GET requests without CSRF token validation or origin verification. Attackers can trigger actions such as disabling the passphrase, rebooting the device, deleting programs, or installing plugins, with the default configuration exposing these endpoints to unauthenticated users due to no required passphrase and a default credential of 'opendoor'. |
| The BEAR – Bulk Editor and Products Manager Professional for WooCommerce by Pluginus.Net plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.5. This is due to missing nonce validation on the woobe_delete_tax_term() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete WooCommerce taxonomy terms (categories, tags, etc.) via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator or shop manager into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Landing Page Builder – Coming Soon page, Maintenance Mode, Lead Page, WordPress Landing Pages plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.3.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ulpb_admin_ajax function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create, update, retitle, or change the post status, slug, and type of arbitrary posts and write ULPB_DATA post meta via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This attack requires the victim to hold an editor-level or administrator session, as the wp_ajax_ulpb_admin_data action enforces a capability check that the forged request must satisfy by inheriting the logged-in user's session cookies. |
| Joomla Extension - joomdonation.com - User enumeration in Events Booking < 5.8.0 - The Joomla extension Events Booking prior version 5.8.0 had an frontend file upload endpoint that lacked CSRF protection. |
| The W3SC Elementor to Zoho CRM plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the storeInfo function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's Zoho CRM integration settings, replacing the configured data center, client ID, client secret, and user email credentials with attacker-controlled values via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| dataCycle is a data management system for centrally storing, managing, searching, finding, and distributing data. In dataCycle-CORE, the module handling core processing and framework rules, before and including version 25.07.3, the application exposes server-side state changes through `GET` routes. Because browsers automatically send cookies on same-site top-level navigation and Rails does not apply CSRF protections to `GET`, an attacker can force a logged-in victim to modify application state by embedding a link, image, iframe, or redirect to one of these endpoints. This was confirmed on the target with a normal `Standard` account: a cross-site-style `GET` to `watch_lists/:id/add_item?thing_id=...` inserted content into a watch list with no CSRF token. Additional `GET` mutation routes exist in the codebase, including user impersonation for authorized admins and cache or
translation state changes. This is patched in version 26.06.08. |
| djangoSIGE through 1.10 (commit a6fe7e8) contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to cancel sales or purchase orders on behalf of authenticated users by exploiting order-cancellation logic implemented inside HTTP GET method handlers in CancelarOrcamentoVendaView, CancelarPedidoVendaView, CancelarOrcamentoCompraView, and CancelarPedidoCompraView. Attackers can lure an authenticated victim with change_orcamentovenda or equivalent permissions to a page containing a cross-origin reference such as an img tag pointing to the cancellation endpoint, bypassing CSRF token validation entirely since Django's CsrfViewMiddleware only enforces CSRF checks on unsafe HTTP methods. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in ApusListing <= 1.2.63 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GiveWP <= 4.16.3 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Avada Core <= 5.15.6 versions. |
