Search

Search Results (395510 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-91135 1 Apache 1 Thrift 2026-10-02 N/A
Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Apache Thrift C++ THeaderTransport. When an application enables the ZLIB transform for the frames it sends, THeaderTransport::transform() copies the compressed frame into the write buffer without making sure it fits. Data that does not compress, such as content a remote peer supplied, grows under compression, so the copy writes past the end of the heap buffer by an amount that grows with the size of the frame, and for large frames it also reads past the end of the transform buffer. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-87117 1 Apache 1 Thrift 2026-10-02 N/A
NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in Apache Thrift PHP bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-86536 1 Apache 1 Thrift 2026-10-02 N/A
Improperly controlled modification of object prototype attributes ('prototype pollution') vulnerability in Apache Thrift all JS bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0 and re-generate JS code, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-86535 2 Apache, Redhat 2 Thrift, Hummingbird 2026-10-02 7.5 High
Loop with unreachable exit condition ('infinite loop'), Improperly controlled modification of object prototype attributes ('prototype pollution') vulnerability in Apache Thrift NodeJS bindings with TJSONProtocol. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-85087 1 Apache 1 Thrift 2026-10-02 N/A
Improper certificate validation, Return of wrong status code vulnerability in Apache Thrift python bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-82459 2 Apache, Redhat 2 Thrift, Hummingbird 2026-10-02 7.5 High
Integer underflow (wrap or wraparound), Out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Apache Thrift C++ 32 bit THeaderTransport. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-80298 1 Havelsan Inc. 1 Sef - Ai Chatbot Platform 2026-10-02 8.8 High
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection') vulnerability in HAVELSAN Inc. Sef - AI Chatbot Platform allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Sef - AI Chatbot Platform: before 2.1. NOTE: The vendor was contacted and it was learned that the product is not supported.
CVE-2026-59671 1 Repasat 1 Repasat Application 2026-10-02 N/A
Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The endpoint “/es/datatables/getemployeetypesdatatable” is affected.
CVE-2026-59670 1 Repasat 1 Repasat Application 2026-10-02 N/A
Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “nomListaValidacion” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/validationslists/assignList/Employee/45659”.
CVE-2026-59669 1 Repasat 1 Repasat Application 2026-10-02 N/A
Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “name” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/attachmenttypes/update/203336”
CVE-2026-59664 1 Repasat 1 Repasat Application 2026-10-02 N/A
Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “nomServicioPrestado” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/providedservices/store”.
CVE-2026-59663 1 Repasat 1 Repasat Application 2026-10-02 N/A
Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “nomDelegacion” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/delegations/store”.
CVE-2026-59662 1 Repasat 1 Repasat Application 2026-10-02 N/A
Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “nomCompetidor” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/competitors/store”.
CVE-2026-18036 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. 1 Bc-java 2026-10-02 N/A
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, NTRU reduced secret values with the % operator in three helpers whose reference implementations are deliberately division-free, so each reduction was carried out by an integer division whose latency depends on the secret operand. Polynomial.modQ divided by a variable divisor, which a compiler cannot strength-reduce to a multiply the way it can a constant one, so it emitted a division on every call including on the decapsulation path where the dividend derives from the private key; Polynomial.mod3 and NTRUSampling.mod3 divided the secret key polynomials f and g during key generation, the message polynomials r and m during encapsulation, and coefficients recovered during decapsulation. An attacker able to measure that timing can recover information about the NTRU private key. modQ now masks, which is exact because q is always a power of two, and mod3 uses the reference implementation's division-free fold and select; the results are unchanged.
CVE-2026-17507 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. 1 Bc-java 2026-10-02 N/A
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the MLS implementation (org.bouncycastle.mls) holds RFC 9420's uint32 leaf_index in a signed int, so a wire value with the top bit set decodes to a negative number. That is a legitimate encoding rather than malformed input, and it must still decode, since the MLS interop test vectors round-trip the full range. GroupKeySet.SecretTree.hasLeaf and Group.validateRemove compared the decoded value directly against the tree's leaf count, and a signed comparison treats any negative int as less than a positive bound, so an out-of-range sender passed the membership check. In the hasLeaf case the SenderData of an unprotected PrivateMessage could then drive LeafIndex.directPath through NodeIndex.parent() arithmetic that never reaches the tree root, growing the resulting node list without bound until the JVM exhausted its heap. A single small message from any current group member could therefore deny service to every other member of the group. Both comparisons now interpret the value as unsigned via Integer.toUnsignedLong, rejecting an out-of-range sender however it was encoded; well-formed leaf indices are unaffected.
CVE-2026-16001 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. 1 Bc-csharp 2026-10-02 N/A
Exposure of the message authentication key through the encryption keystream in the stream mode of IesEngine (an IesEngine constructed without a block cipher) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows a remote attacker who has observed one encrypted message with known plaintext to forge shorter messages of their choosing that the recipient accepts as authentic, via a crafted ciphertext and MAC tag, because the MAC key was taken from the key derivation output directly after a keystream as long as the message, while the derivation input depends only on the static key pair and fixed parameters. The keystream revealed by that one message therefore contains the MAC key for every sufficiently shorter message.
CVE-2026-16000 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. 1 Bc-csharp 2026-10-02 N/A
Missing cryptographic step in the DSTU 7624 CCM mode implementation (KCcmBlockCipher) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows an attacker who can observe encrypted messages of known or chosen content to forge ciphertexts with valid authentication tags, via messages encrypted without associated data. The cause is that the G1 block, which binds the nonce, the message length and the parameter flags into the CBC-MAC, was processed only when associated data was present. Without associated data the tag was a CBC-MAC of the plaintext alone, independent of the nonce. Only applications that use KCcmBlockCipher directly and supply no associated data are affected.
CVE-2026-15999 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. 1 Bc-csharp 2026-10-02 N/A
Improper validation of integrity check value in the AES-CCM implementation (CcmParameters and CcmBlockCipher) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows an on-path attacker to modify CCM-encrypted content without detection via an AlgorithmIdentifier whose CCMParameters declare an authentication tag (aes-ICVlen) of zero or another length outside the RFC 5084 set, because CcmParameters accepted any value and CcmBlockCipher validated the tag length only when encrypting, so decryption compared a zero-length or very short tag. Affected paths include ParameterUtilities.GetCipherParameters, used by CmsEnvelopedData and CmsEnvelopedDataParser for EnvelopedData encrypted with AES-CCM, and any caller passing an unchecked tag length to CcmBlockCipher for decryption.
CVE-2026-104606 2 Itsourcecode, Sourcecodester 2 Online Admission System Project, Online Admission System 2026-10-02 6.3 Medium
A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Online Admission System Project 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file confirm.php. The manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.
CVE-2026-104422 2 Zcashfoundation, Zfnd 2 Zebra, Zebra 2026-10-02 7.5 High
The block sync download path in Zebra (zebrad) before 6.3.0 reads a block's height from its unvalidated coinbase scriptSig and drops blocks that appear too far behind the tip before consensus validation, without penalizing the supplying peer. Because V5 transaction IDs exclude the scriptSig, a malicious peer can repeatedly serve a canonical block whose coinbase claims height 1 while keeping the requested hash, delaying the node's discovery of the newest block.