Search

Search Results (356140 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-64844 2026-08-30 N/A
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
CVE-2026-64843 2026-08-30 N/A
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
CVE-2026-64842 2026-08-30 N/A
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
CVE-2026-64841 2026-08-30 N/A
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
CVE-2026-64840 2026-08-30 N/A
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
CVE-2026-64839 2026-08-30 N/A
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
CVE-2026-56716 2026-08-30 N/A
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
CVE-2026-56715 2026-08-30 N/A
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
CVE-2026-56713 2026-08-30 N/A
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
CVE-2026-82553 1 Sambitraj 2 Student-management-system, Student Management System 2026-08-30 6.3 Medium
A vulnerability was detected in sambitraj Student Management System up to 56ba287f2e9031523ccb4244cb6e3fe530e4e5d5. Affected by this issue is the function mysqli_query of the file student_dashboard.php of the component Student Dashboard. The manipulation of the argument roll_no results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
CVE-2026-82555 1 Totolink 2 N600r, N600r Firmware 2026-08-30 3.7 Low
A vulnerability has been found in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7866_B20220506. This vulnerability affects the function loginAuth of the file /web_cste/cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Authentication Handler. Such manipulation leads to insufficiently random values. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. It is stated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
CVE-2026-82367 1 Ash-project 1 Ash Graphql 2026-08-30 N/A
Exposure of Data Element to Wrong Session vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql can deliver one subscription's resolved records to a different subscriber's topic. AshGraphql.Subscription.Batcher.do_send/5 reads the resolved batch from the process dictionary via Process.get(:batch_resolved) and then unconditionally deletes it. That is sound only inside a task the library owns. On the :backpressure_sync and :noproc fallbacks do_send/5 runs inline in the publishing caller's process, so if a resolver inside an outer do_send/5 triggers another synchronous Ash notification, the inner call finds the outer run's value still under :batch_resolved, adopts it as its own result, and publishes it to the inner topic, a different subscription document with a different actor and tenant. It then deletes the key, so the outer run publishes nothing. The key is not namespaced by run, so records cannot be told apart. The fix saves, clears, and restores :batch_resolved around each run. This issue affects ash_graphql: from 1.4.0 before 1.11.0.
CVE-2026-81322 1 Ash-project 1 Ash Cloak 2026-08-30 N/A
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in ash-project ash_cloak allows anyone with access to logs, error trackers, or crash reports, or anyone who can trigger a validation error, to recover the plaintext of a field the library encrypts. AshCloak.Transformers.SetUpEncryption removes each cloaked attribute from the action's accept list and adds an action argument that carries the plaintext into the encryption change. That argument is built with sensitive?: attr.sensitive?, inheriting the flag from the source attribute, so a cloaked attribute declared without sensitive? true produces a non-sensitive argument. It is the only place the cleartext value lives, and the one place Ash will not redact: it appears verbatim in inspect(changeset), Ash.Error.Invalid and validation error messages, telemetry, :sys dumps, and error-tracker payloads. The generated encrypted attribute and decrypt calculation are already hardcoded sensitive. This issue affects ash_cloak: from 0.1.0 before 0.4.0.
CVE-2026-81319 1 Ash-project 1 Ash Cloak 2026-08-30 N/A
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in ash-project ash_cloak allows an attacker who can influence the bytes of an encrypted column to crash the BEAM node, by triggering unbounded atom creation or a decompression bomb during decryption. AshCloak.Calculations.Decrypt decodes the decrypted binary with Ash.Helpers.non_executable_binary_to_term/1 without the :safe option, so atoms in the payload are interned during the decode and never garbage collected, and the term format's compressed form is inflated transparently. vault.decrypt!() is the only barrier and stops tampering only for an authenticated cipher. Cloak also ships the unauthenticated AES.CTR, whose ciphertext an attacker who knows their own plaintext can XOR into any same-length payload without the key, so an ordinary read of the forged column reaches the decoder. A few hundred kilobytes of distinct atoms exhausts the atom table, or a small compressed payload inflates to gigabytes. This issue affects ash_cloak: from 0.1.0 before 0.4.0.
CVE-2026-82548 2 Linux Foundation, Linuxfoundation 2 Magma, Magma 2026-08-30 5.3 Medium
A vulnerability was determined in Linux Foundation Magma 1.9.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component InitialUEMessage Handler. This manipulation causes information disclosure. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
CVE-2026-82547 2 Linux Foundation, Linuxfoundation 2 Magma, Magma 2026-08-30 6.5 Medium
A vulnerability was found in Linux Foundation Magma 1.9.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file tasks/amf/amf_fsm.cpp of the component Registration Complete Message Handler. The manipulation results in improper authentication. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.
CVE-2026-82551 1 Linux Foundation 1 Magma 2026-08-30 5.3 Medium
A weakness has been identified in Linux Foundation Magma 1.9.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file ngap_amf_handlers.c of the component NGSetup Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to state issue. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
CVE-2026-82550 1 Linux Foundation 1 Magma 2026-08-30 5.3 Medium
A security flaw has been discovered in Linux Foundation Magma 1.9.0. This impacts an unknown function of the component NGSetupRequest Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument NG-IoT-DefaultPagingDRX results in improper input validation. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
CVE-2026-82638 1 Jina-ai 1 Reader 2026-08-30 7.5 High
jina-ai reader disables its private-address guard outside Google Cloud deployments, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform server-side request forgery. Attackers can supply publicly resolvable hostnames mapping to private addresses to retrieve cloud metadata and internal service content.
CVE-2026-78699 1 Ash-project 1 Ash Postgres 2026-08-30 N/A
Unchecked Return Value vulnerability in ash-project ash_postgres allows a user who can drive a tenant rename to a name that collides with an existing tenant's schema to have their tenant record repointed at that other tenant's live schema, gaining access to its data. AshPostgres.MultiTenancy.rename_tenant/3 issues the ALTER SCHEMA ... RENAME TO ... with the non-raising Ecto.Adapters.SQL.query/2, discards its {:ok, _} | {:error, _} result, and unconditionally returns :ok. PostgreSQL rejects the rename when the target schema already exists (and on insufficient privilege or lock timeout), but that failure never reaches the caller. The calling manage_tenant update action therefore sees success and commits the tenant row with the new name, which is the schema of a different existing tenant, so subsequent reads and writes for that tenant run against the other tenant's data. This issue affects ash_postgres: from 0.25.0 before 2.13.0.