Search Results (14839 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-6428 2 Google, Mozilla 2 Android, Firefox 2026-04-20 4.3 Medium
When a URL was provided in a link querystring parameter, Firefox for Android would follow that URL instead of the correct URL, potentially leading to phishing attacks. *This bug only affects Firefox for Android. Other versions of Firefox are unaffected.*. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 140.
CVE-2026-1260 1 Google 1 Sentencepiece 2026-04-18 7.8 High
Invalid memory access in Sentencepiece versions less than 0.2.1 when using a vulnerable model file, which is not created in the normal training procedure.
CVE-2026-0994 2 Google, Protobuf 3 Protobuf, Protobuf-python, Protobuf 2026-04-18 7.5 High
A denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability exists in google.protobuf.json_format.ParseDict() in Python, where the max_recursion_depth limit can be bypassed when parsing nested google.protobuf.Any messages. Due to missing recursion depth accounting inside the internal Any-handling logic, an attacker can supply deeply nested Any structures that bypass the intended recursion limit, eventually exhausting Python’s recursion stack and causing a RecursionError.
CVE-2026-1504 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-04-18 6.5 Medium
Inappropriate implementation in Background Fetch API in Google Chrome prior to 144.0.7559.110 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-6359 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-04-17 8.8 High
Use after free in Video in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 147.0.7727.101 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to perform out of bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-6363 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-04-17 8.8 High
Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.101 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform out of bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
CVE-2026-6358 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-04-17 8.8 High
Use after free in XR in Google Chrome on Android prior to 147.0.7727.101 allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory read via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)
CVE-2026-6316 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more 2026-04-17 8.8 High
Use after free in Forms in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.101 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-6313 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more 2026-04-17 3.1 Low
Insufficient policy enforcement in CORS in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.101 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-3545 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more 2026-04-17 9.6 Critical
Insufficient data validation in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 145.0.7632.159 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2025-12742 1 Google 1 Cloud Looker 2026-04-15 N/A
A Looker user with a Developer role could cause Looker to execute a malicious command, due to insecure processing of Teradata driver parameters. Looker-hosted and Self-hosted were found to be vulnerable. This issue has already been mitigated for Looker-hosted instances. No user action is required for these. Self-hosted instances must be upgraded as soon as possible. This vulnerability has been patched in all supported versions of Self-hosted. The versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability. You can download these versions at the Looker download page https://download.looker.com/ : * 24.12.108+ * 24.18.200+ * 25.0.78+ * 25.6.65+ * 25.8.47+ * 25.12.10+ * 25.14+
CVE-2025-64304 3 Apple, Fujitv, Google 3 Ios, Fod App, Android 2026-04-15 N/A
"FOD" App uses hard-coded cryptographic keys, which may allow a local unauthenticated attacker to retrieve the cryptographic keys.
CVE-2025-8524 2 Boquan, Google 2 Dotwalle App, Android 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
A vulnerability was found in Boquan DotWallet App 2.15.2 on Android and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file AndroidManifest.xml of the component com.boquanhash.dotwallet. The manipulation leads to improper export of android application components. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
CVE-2025-56146 1 Google 1 Android 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
Indian Bank IndSMART Android App 3.8.1 is vulnerable to Missing SSL Certificate Validation in NuWebViewActivity.
CVE-2025-8523 2 Google, Riderlike 2 Android, Fruit Crush-brain App 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
A vulnerability has been found in RiderLike Fruit Crush-Brain App 1.0 on Android and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file AndroidManifest.xml of the component com.fruitcrush.fun. The manipulation leads to improper export of android application components. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
CVE-2025-10184 2 Google, Oneplus 2 Android, Oxygenos 2026-04-15 N/A
The vulnerability allows any application installed on the device to read SMS/MMS data and metadata from the system-provided Telephony provider without permission, user interaction, or consent. The user is also not notified that SMS data is being accessed. This could lead to sensitive information disclosure and could effectively break the security provided by SMS-based Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) checks. The root cause is a combination of missing permissions for write operations in several content providers (com.android.providers.telephony.PushMessageProvider, com.android.providers.telephony.PushShopProvider, com.android.providers.telephony.ServiceNumberProvider), and a blind SQL injection in the update method of those providers.
CVE-2026-4444 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more 2026-03-25 8.8 High
Stack buffer overflow in WebRTC in Google Chrome prior to 146.0.7680.153 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit stack corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2025-53627 2 Google, Meshtastic 3 Android, Firmware, Meshtastic Firmware 2026-02-26 5.3 Medium
Meshtastic is an open source mesh networking solution. The Meshtastic firmware (starting from version 2.5) introduces asymmetric encryption (PKI) for direct messages, but when the `pki_encrypted` flag is missing, the firmware silently falls back to legacy AES-256-CTR channel encryption. This was an intentional decision to maintain backwards compatibility. However, the end-user applications, like Web app, iOS/Android app, and applications built on top of Meshtastic using the SDK, did not have a way to differentiate between end-to-end encrypted DMs and the legacy DMs. This creates a downgrade attack path where adversaries who know a shared channel key can craft and inject spoofed direct messages that are displayed as if they were PKC encrypted. Users are not given any feedback of whether a direct message was decrypted with PKI or with legacy symmetric encryption, undermining the expected security guarantees of the PKI rollout. Version 2.7.15 fixes this issue.
CVE-2025-2783 2 Google, Microsoft 2 Chrome, Windows 2026-02-26 8.3 High
Incorrect handle provided in unspecified circumstances in Mojo in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 134.0.6998.177 allowed a remote attacker to perform a sandbox escape via a malicious file. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2024-43095 1 Google 1 Android 2026-02-26 7.8 High
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to obtain any system permission due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.