Search
Search Results (8 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-9143 | 4 Debian, Netapp, Openssl and 1 more | 50 Debian Linux, 500f, 500f Firmware and 47 more | 2026-11-09 | 8.8 High |
| Issue summary: Use of the low-level GF(2^m) elliptic curve APIs with untrusted explicit values for the field polynomial can lead to out-of-bounds memory reads or writes. Impact summary: Out of bound memory writes can lead to an application crash or even a possibility of a remote code execution, however, in all the protocols involving Elliptic Curve Cryptography that we're aware of, either only "named curves" are supported, or, if explicit curve parameters are supported, they specify an X9.62 encoding of binary (GF(2^m)) curves that can't represent problematic input values. Thus the likelihood of existence of a vulnerable application is low. In particular, the X9.62 encoding is used for ECC keys in X.509 certificates, so problematic inputs cannot occur in the context of processing X.509 certificates. Any problematic use-cases would have to be using an "exotic" curve encoding. The affected APIs include: EC_GROUP_new_curve_GF2m(), EC_GROUP_new_from_params(), and various supporting BN_GF2m_*() functions. Applications working with "exotic" explicit binary (GF(2^m)) curve parameters, that make it possible to represent invalid field polynomials with a zero constant term, via the above or similar APIs, may terminate abruptly as a result of reading or writing outside of array bounds. Remote code execution cannot easily be ruled out. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2511 | 5 Debian, Netapp, Openssl and 2 more | 102 Debian Linux, 500f, 500f Firmware and 99 more | 2026-11-06 | 5.9 Medium |
| Issue summary: Some non-default TLS server configurations can cause unbounded memory growth when processing TLSv1.3 sessions Impact summary: An attacker may exploit certain server configurations to trigger unbounded memory growth that would lead to a Denial of Service This problem can occur in TLSv1.3 if the non-default SSL_OP_NO_TICKET option is being used (but not if early_data support is also configured and the default anti-replay protection is in use). In this case, under certain conditions, the session cache can get into an incorrect state and it will fail to flush properly as it fills. The session cache will continue to grow in an unbounded manner. A malicious client could deliberately create the scenario for this failure to force a Denial of Service. It may also happen by accident in normal operation. This issue only affects TLS servers supporting TLSv1.3. It does not affect TLS clients. The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is also not affected by this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2020-26140 | 6 Alfa, Arista, Cisco and 3 more | 389 Awus036h, Awus036h Firmware, C-100 and 386 more | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 6.1316.1209 for AWUS036H. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept plaintext frames in a protected Wi-Fi network. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary data frames independent of the network configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2020-24588 | 9 Arista, Cisco, Debian and 6 more | 351 C-100, C-100 Firmware, C-110 and 348 more | 2026-04-14 | 3.5 Low |
| The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that the A-MSDU flag in the plaintext QoS header field is authenticated. Against devices that support receiving non-SSP A-MSDU frames (which is mandatory as part of 802.11n), an adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets. | ||||
| CVE-2022-31766 | 1 Siemens | 32 Ruggedcom Rm1224, Ruggedcom Rm1224 Firmware, Scalance M804pb and 29 more | 2025-04-21 | 8.6 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EU (6GK6108-4AM00-2BA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) NAM (6GK6108-4AM00-2DA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE M804PB (6GK5804-0AP00-2AA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-Router (6GK5812-1AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-Router (6GK5812-1BA00-2AA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-Router (6GK5816-1AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-Router (6GK5816-1BA00-2AA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE M826-2 SHDSL-Router (6GK5826-2AB00-2AB2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE M874-2 (6GK5874-2AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE M874-3 (6GK5874-3AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE M876-3 (6GK5876-3AA02-2BA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE M876-3 (ROK) (6GK5876-3AA02-2EA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE M876-4 (6GK5876-4AA10-2BA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE M876-4 (EU) (6GK5876-4AA00-2BA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE M876-4 (NAM) (6GK5876-4AA00-2DA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (EU) (6GK5853-2EA00-2DA1) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (EU) (6GK5856-2EA00-3DA1) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (RoW) (6GK5856-2EA00-3AA1) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE S615 EEC LAN-Router (6GK5615-0AA01-2AA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE S615 LAN-Router (6GK5615-0AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V7.1.2), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-7DA0) (All versions >= V1.1.0 < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (6GK5766-1GE00-7DA0) (All versions >= V1.1.0 < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DB0) (All versions >= V1.1.0 < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (6GK5766-1GE00-7TA0) (All versions >= V1.1.0 < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TB0) (All versions >= V1.1.0 < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3AA0) (All versions >= V1.1.0 < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3DA0) (All versions >= V1.1.0 < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (6GK5766-1GE00-3DA0) (All versions >= V1.1.0 < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (USA) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DB0) (All versions >= V1.1.0 < V3.0.0). Affected devices with TCP Event service enabled do not properly handle malformed packets. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service condition and reboot the device thus possibly affecting other network resources. | ||||
| CVE-2022-46140 | 1 Siemens | 202 Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Eu, Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Eu Firmware, Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Nam and 199 more | 2025-04-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Affected devices use a weak encryption scheme to encrypt the debug zip file. This could allow an authenticated attacker to decrypt the contents of the file and retrieve debug information about the system. | ||||
| CVE-2022-46142 | 1 Siemens | 202 Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Eu, Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Eu Firmware, Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Nam and 199 more | 2025-04-21 | 5.7 Medium |
| Affected devices store the CLI user passwords encrypted in flash memory. Attackers with physical access to the device could retrieve the file and decrypt the CLI user passwords. | ||||
| CVE-2022-46143 | 1 Siemens | 202 Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Eu, Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Eu Firmware, Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Nam and 199 more | 2025-01-14 | 2.7 Low |
| Affected devices do not check the TFTP blocksize correctly. This could allow an authenticated attacker to read from an uninitialized buffer that potentially contains previously allocated data. | ||||
Page 1 of 1.